Your cart
Your cart is empty.HEALTH NEWS
The Meltdown of Public Health and Personal Freedom
August 2, 2006
The United States government and especially the FDA have lost credibility in assisting you with your personal health. Instead, they have placed the vast resources of our federal government behind a twisted public health agenda that perpetuates the profits of the elite and the unspoken primary agenda of eugenics. The daily assault on American freedom is now like living in the twilight zone. Public health policy, under the guise of public benefit, is a primary tool of a despotic regime. It is a system designed to convince Americans to hand over their remaining freedoms, as a decayed government grapples to maintain control over its increasingly restless citizens.
Health care that is patient-centered is based on a personal relationship with health care professionals that act as patient sponsors, promoting and defending the interests of the patient as the primary importance. In a free society, a majority of individuals can establish an emotional bond in the doctor-patient relationship that inspires hopefulness. There are many health options a patient may choose to fortify personal health, options that are naturally embraced by physicians whom have the patient as their top priority.
Public health, by contrast, plays on the fear of disease to persuade individuals to give up their personal rights in the name of the “greater good.” If we had truly benevolent leaders, public health programs could be used for the benefit of the citizens. Instead, we have a pathetic combination of drug sales, environmental poisoning, military objectives, and herd control masquerading as public health.
Medical care today is rapidly losing touch with patient-centered care. The managed care of the past few decades is a form of cost containment that all but eliminated the doctor-patient relationship. Evidence-based medical training has been replaced with drug dispensing protocols based on numbers on paper and the behavior of cells in a test tube. This disconnected approach kills over 100,000 Americans per year and injures millions of others. This is not a problem when a nation's healthcare policy is based on eugenics. It is completely fine if many thousands of the weakest are killed.
The pubic health drug-dispensing machine is always on the lookout for new target markets. The FDA allows the elite profiteers to poison our children, incapacitate our elderly, and sell billions of dollars of toxic and near-useless drugs to aging baby boomers in the name of prevention (off label use). Who is left? That became obvious with the new Bush Medicare drug coverage plan. All of a sudden drug sales jumped 5%. Why? A new market was emerging—low income people. Public health officials are now literally going door to door to entice the low income market into getting on their rightful drugs, at the expense of the middle class taxpayers. Yes, the government is willing to spend $45 a person of taxpayer money to get low income people signed up. Such ludicrous programs have nothing to do with personal health. Soon, it will be illegal to not answer your door when the neighborhood Nazi health patrol rings the bell.
Of course, we are constantly reminded of the great wisdom of public health. When 16-year-old Abraham Cherrix refused to take another round of chemotherapy, his parents quickly found the state wanted custody of their child so they could enforce “health care.” Not only is the child sick and struggling; now he must go to court simply to defend his own health freedom. In patient-centered care, his doctor would be standing up for him. In totalitarian public health, doctors quiver in their boots rather than rock the boat.
Yes, we live in the era where the doctor-patient relationship is defined by laws created for drug companies, held in place by state public health laws and a legion of whimpy doctors who cow-toe and live in fear of their licensing boards. Any person needing medical care has two main problems; the health issue needing improvement and the perverse system of public healthcare masquerading as personal health. Consumer beware, the latter is oftentimes far more dangerous than the health problem. A patient can no longer count on his or her doctor to be their advocate, a very sad state of affairs.
Public health always injures innocent people as collateral damage. Public health exceeds its rational value by harping on the fear of disease, an agenda trumpeted by those who profit. It now costs around $1200 to immunize a child. There is no proof any of these immunizations are currently needed. Another $400 will be added to this fee for nine-year-old girls, as soon as the government approves a sexual disease vaccine. Yes, now our government will immunize to permit or tacitly encourage questionable sexual behavior. This, of course, is the Rockefeller model of public heath, one based on sexual freedom, abortion rights, no responsibility, and no values.
Vaccination programs are not for any one person's health. In fact, vaccinations carry considerable risk of health damage. Up to 1% of the children who are vaccinated have deficient sIGA immune responses, meaning they are likely to be made quite ill by the vaccinations. Throw in some mercury as a preservative and use chicken myelin protein to grow the vaccines, and we have a recipe for nerve damage. Yes, all children could be screened before hand to see who is at risk. However, that is patient-centered care and costly to providers as well as casting doubt on the safety of immunizations. Public health based on eugenics likes to see the weak eliminated from society. And yes, an autistic child will cost the parents one million dollars in extra healthcare expenses, which ought to keep the parents too busy working on behalf of Big Pharma to raise much protest.
We are one step from socialized medicine, about to plunge into the European model of degenerate public health. In plain and simple American English, that means the complete loss of personal health freedom. The “greatest generation” that fought to defend the world from Nazi takeover now finds themselves the unwilling puppets in the drive for socialized medicine. The elite have stripped away their pensions, reduced the purchasing power of their social security dollars, and left them trying to decide between poor quality food and overpriced drugs. Such a large population of Americans is backed into a corner – socialized medicine sounds good to them. Hitler would be smiling.
Yes, Hitler knew all too well of the vital importance of public health to control the herd. During his rise to power he used public health programs as an excuse to eliminate health freedoms for all German people (they have never recovered). Then he blended Nazi public health with his military agenda, silencing those who objected with his very own Department of Homeland Security. In the name of public health's greater good, Nazi doctors killed hundreds of thousands of Germans and Jews while performing hideous experiments on “undesirable citizens.” After all, they were scheduled for termination as part of Hitler's eugenics (patterned after the Rockefeller model). The Nuremberg Code was established as a world-wide code of ethics to prevent this type of atrocity from ever occurring again; however, the U.S. government under the false guise of national security has repeatedly violated it ever since it was created. [Read Fight for Your Health.]
The Bush administration is currently seeking unprecedented police-like power to control personal freedom. A case in point is his attempt to tie public health emergencies to the confiscation of firearms. The fact that our government would even attempt such a ploy is testament to the fact that the people of America are currently under a government that believes in totalitarian control at the expense of rights, including health rights. For example, if there was a pandemic flu outbreak, the Homeland Security appropriations bill (HR 5441) proposes that federal agents be allowed to confiscate firearms during this public health emergency. A last minute amendment defeated this proposal (Senate vote 84-16), preserving our rights. Interesting is the list of anti-American Democrats (like Kennedy) voting in favor of federal police power.
Amongst them we find the cream of the crop, in terms of attempting to suppress health freedom in America. On the list is Hillary Clinton (D-NY), Richard Durbin (D-IL), Diane Feinstein (D-CA), and Charles Schumer (D-NY). These despicable politicians have a history of voting against your health options, seeking to eliminate useful nutritional products from the market (S722) and currently trying to entangle supplement manufacturers in a public health scam that will drastically undermine patient's health options.
Hillary Clinton is particularly skilled at manipulating public opinion, and is a huge backer of socialized medicine and public health at the expense of citizen's rights. The reason her healthcare proposals failed so miserably in her husband's administration is because she alienated the vested-interests who profit from keeping people sick. She has re-invented herself, now gaining support from the very people she criticized. This will enable her to get large pharmaceutical dollars in her 2008 Presidential run. Only a President as disgusting as George Bush could make Hillary Clinton seem like a viable candidate, which is no doubt part of the elite plan. Americans will soon be picking their poison. Are we ready to swallow the Clinton pill?
In the meantime, Bush is seeking to do everything he can to set up laws that will directly undermine rights of citizens and Americans who protest totalitarian government activities. Playing on the public fear of terrorism, Bush has a new plan to set up secret tribunal courts in our own country and detain enemy combatants, and a new definition for enemy combatant that legal experts believe could easily be extended to any American speaking out against our government. The last time such secret courts existed in a “free people” was in Germany during the rise of Hitler. They were routinely used to harass and execute those who would not follow the Pied Piper, all in the name of national security and eugenics.
It isn't hard to imagine the conversations taking place at the elite roundtable. “Yes, we are thrilled with the eight years under Bush. We have bigger government, unpayable tax obligations for the next 50 years, socialized drug dispensing, Homeland Security, huge profits for Big Pharma, big oil and the war machine, and near total erosion of the U.S. Constitution. And now that Americans are tired of Bush's neo-con warmongering, we'll get Hillary into power next. She'll socialize medicine, harmonize health laws to repressive international standards, get her husband to run the U.N., do away with American values, and create the international framework to fully implement globalization. Yes, it has been a long eighty-five year fight for supremacy of the New World Order. It has not been easy turning those stubborn freedom-loving Americans into gopher-workers to perpetuate and fund our activities. We are just awaiting the final nails in the coffin. Let's hope the American middle class fails to wake up. It is only a brief matter of time before our eugenics dream has no opposition.”
Health care that is patient-centered is based on a personal relationship with health care professionals that act as patient sponsors, promoting and defending the interests of the patient as the primary importance. In a free society, a majority of individuals can establish an emotional bond in the doctor-patient relationship that inspires hopefulness. There are many health options a patient may choose to fortify personal health, options that are naturally embraced by physicians whom have the patient as their top priority.
Public health, by contrast, plays on the fear of disease to persuade individuals to give up their personal rights in the name of the “greater good.” If we had truly benevolent leaders, public health programs could be used for the benefit of the citizens. Instead, we have a pathetic combination of drug sales, environmental poisoning, military objectives, and herd control masquerading as public health.
Medical care today is rapidly losing touch with patient-centered care. The managed care of the past few decades is a form of cost containment that all but eliminated the doctor-patient relationship. Evidence-based medical training has been replaced with drug dispensing protocols based on numbers on paper and the behavior of cells in a test tube. This disconnected approach kills over 100,000 Americans per year and injures millions of others. This is not a problem when a nation's healthcare policy is based on eugenics. It is completely fine if many thousands of the weakest are killed.
The pubic health drug-dispensing machine is always on the lookout for new target markets. The FDA allows the elite profiteers to poison our children, incapacitate our elderly, and sell billions of dollars of toxic and near-useless drugs to aging baby boomers in the name of prevention (off label use). Who is left? That became obvious with the new Bush Medicare drug coverage plan. All of a sudden drug sales jumped 5%. Why? A new market was emerging—low income people. Public health officials are now literally going door to door to entice the low income market into getting on their rightful drugs, at the expense of the middle class taxpayers. Yes, the government is willing to spend $45 a person of taxpayer money to get low income people signed up. Such ludicrous programs have nothing to do with personal health. Soon, it will be illegal to not answer your door when the neighborhood Nazi health patrol rings the bell.
Of course, we are constantly reminded of the great wisdom of public health. When 16-year-old Abraham Cherrix refused to take another round of chemotherapy, his parents quickly found the state wanted custody of their child so they could enforce “health care.” Not only is the child sick and struggling; now he must go to court simply to defend his own health freedom. In patient-centered care, his doctor would be standing up for him. In totalitarian public health, doctors quiver in their boots rather than rock the boat.
Yes, we live in the era where the doctor-patient relationship is defined by laws created for drug companies, held in place by state public health laws and a legion of whimpy doctors who cow-toe and live in fear of their licensing boards. Any person needing medical care has two main problems; the health issue needing improvement and the perverse system of public healthcare masquerading as personal health. Consumer beware, the latter is oftentimes far more dangerous than the health problem. A patient can no longer count on his or her doctor to be their advocate, a very sad state of affairs.
Public health always injures innocent people as collateral damage. Public health exceeds its rational value by harping on the fear of disease, an agenda trumpeted by those who profit. It now costs around $1200 to immunize a child. There is no proof any of these immunizations are currently needed. Another $400 will be added to this fee for nine-year-old girls, as soon as the government approves a sexual disease vaccine. Yes, now our government will immunize to permit or tacitly encourage questionable sexual behavior. This, of course, is the Rockefeller model of public heath, one based on sexual freedom, abortion rights, no responsibility, and no values.
Vaccination programs are not for any one person's health. In fact, vaccinations carry considerable risk of health damage. Up to 1% of the children who are vaccinated have deficient sIGA immune responses, meaning they are likely to be made quite ill by the vaccinations. Throw in some mercury as a preservative and use chicken myelin protein to grow the vaccines, and we have a recipe for nerve damage. Yes, all children could be screened before hand to see who is at risk. However, that is patient-centered care and costly to providers as well as casting doubt on the safety of immunizations. Public health based on eugenics likes to see the weak eliminated from society. And yes, an autistic child will cost the parents one million dollars in extra healthcare expenses, which ought to keep the parents too busy working on behalf of Big Pharma to raise much protest.
We are one step from socialized medicine, about to plunge into the European model of degenerate public health. In plain and simple American English, that means the complete loss of personal health freedom. The “greatest generation” that fought to defend the world from Nazi takeover now finds themselves the unwilling puppets in the drive for socialized medicine. The elite have stripped away their pensions, reduced the purchasing power of their social security dollars, and left them trying to decide between poor quality food and overpriced drugs. Such a large population of Americans is backed into a corner – socialized medicine sounds good to them. Hitler would be smiling.
Yes, Hitler knew all too well of the vital importance of public health to control the herd. During his rise to power he used public health programs as an excuse to eliminate health freedoms for all German people (they have never recovered). Then he blended Nazi public health with his military agenda, silencing those who objected with his very own Department of Homeland Security. In the name of public health's greater good, Nazi doctors killed hundreds of thousands of Germans and Jews while performing hideous experiments on “undesirable citizens.” After all, they were scheduled for termination as part of Hitler's eugenics (patterned after the Rockefeller model). The Nuremberg Code was established as a world-wide code of ethics to prevent this type of atrocity from ever occurring again; however, the U.S. government under the false guise of national security has repeatedly violated it ever since it was created. [Read Fight for Your Health.]
The Bush administration is currently seeking unprecedented police-like power to control personal freedom. A case in point is his attempt to tie public health emergencies to the confiscation of firearms. The fact that our government would even attempt such a ploy is testament to the fact that the people of America are currently under a government that believes in totalitarian control at the expense of rights, including health rights. For example, if there was a pandemic flu outbreak, the Homeland Security appropriations bill (HR 5441) proposes that federal agents be allowed to confiscate firearms during this public health emergency. A last minute amendment defeated this proposal (Senate vote 84-16), preserving our rights. Interesting is the list of anti-American Democrats (like Kennedy) voting in favor of federal police power.
Amongst them we find the cream of the crop, in terms of attempting to suppress health freedom in America. On the list is Hillary Clinton (D-NY), Richard Durbin (D-IL), Diane Feinstein (D-CA), and Charles Schumer (D-NY). These despicable politicians have a history of voting against your health options, seeking to eliminate useful nutritional products from the market (S722) and currently trying to entangle supplement manufacturers in a public health scam that will drastically undermine patient's health options.
Hillary Clinton is particularly skilled at manipulating public opinion, and is a huge backer of socialized medicine and public health at the expense of citizen's rights. The reason her healthcare proposals failed so miserably in her husband's administration is because she alienated the vested-interests who profit from keeping people sick. She has re-invented herself, now gaining support from the very people she criticized. This will enable her to get large pharmaceutical dollars in her 2008 Presidential run. Only a President as disgusting as George Bush could make Hillary Clinton seem like a viable candidate, which is no doubt part of the elite plan. Americans will soon be picking their poison. Are we ready to swallow the Clinton pill?
In the meantime, Bush is seeking to do everything he can to set up laws that will directly undermine rights of citizens and Americans who protest totalitarian government activities. Playing on the public fear of terrorism, Bush has a new plan to set up secret tribunal courts in our own country and detain enemy combatants, and a new definition for enemy combatant that legal experts believe could easily be extended to any American speaking out against our government. The last time such secret courts existed in a “free people” was in Germany during the rise of Hitler. They were routinely used to harass and execute those who would not follow the Pied Piper, all in the name of national security and eugenics.
It isn't hard to imagine the conversations taking place at the elite roundtable. “Yes, we are thrilled with the eight years under Bush. We have bigger government, unpayable tax obligations for the next 50 years, socialized drug dispensing, Homeland Security, huge profits for Big Pharma, big oil and the war machine, and near total erosion of the U.S. Constitution. And now that Americans are tired of Bush's neo-con warmongering, we'll get Hillary into power next. She'll socialize medicine, harmonize health laws to repressive international standards, get her husband to run the U.N., do away with American values, and create the international framework to fully implement globalization. Yes, it has been a long eighty-five year fight for supremacy of the New World Order. It has not been easy turning those stubborn freedom-loving Americans into gopher-workers to perpetuate and fund our activities. We are just awaiting the final nails in the coffin. Let's hope the American middle class fails to wake up. It is only a brief matter of time before our eugenics dream has no opposition.”
Share this content
Recent News
